india today is like wild west of the internet startup days of yore, but with a lot less innovation, creativity and substance. sorry for the sudden shocking dose of reality, but the truth of the matter (at least in my eyes), is that nobody is really making cool shit. what very few smart teams are doing is brilliantly executing a strategy of concept arbitrage, localizing with a high degree of sensitivity, and being nimble enough to adapt to market and user needs (i see the first phase of burrp! fit into this category, although i daresay we’re certainly innovating for the future – more to come on that). even this is very risky, since a). nobody copies shitty products, hence, a high bar has already been set and b). an upfront assumption is made that the concept being “borrowed” cures a pain point that exists in this market as well.
internet companies in india are now starting to borrow concepts not from abroad – oh no, that’s so last year – but rather other indian consumer-facing internet companies. not only that, they are starting to pick and choose what products to mash up, as if they were in some peach orchard, and then serving up what they think is a delicious peach cobbler. unfortunately, it tastes more like shit cobbler. see, the fallacy of the me-too mashup is that it becomes exponentially harder to “succeed”, whatever the definition for success might be (page views, ad revenue, registered users, etc.) since theoretically, the product now copies two or more existing respectable products (respectable enough for you to copy, anyways).
let’s take an arbitrary example of an indian consumer-facing internet company that was recently funded $10MM by a reputable VC firm. they have a blogging platform, a yellow-pages section, a social network, a classifieds section, a local section, and a travel section. what this means to me is that for this application to be compelling enough for me to use, the blogging platform should be better than or equal to wordpress; yellow-pages section should be better than or equal to justdial; the social network should be better than or equal to facebook; local section should be better than or equal to burrp!; and the travel section should be better than or equal to tripadvisor. now, i’d even go as far as to say that i’d be willing to consider this application if these products were even slightly less qualified than their models, given some benefit i’d theoretically receive from having these products under one domain – but with services like pageflakes, netvibes, igoogle, etc., even this is questionable.
so a word of caution – the goal for an entrepreneur playing this game should either be to aim for a strong # 2 position, but with the ultimate goal of making a product better than the one you copy. if this isn’t manageable, start innovating.